Posted on February 28th, 2011 by annakjarzab
Seriously, what was the Oscars last night? Somebody must’ve gotten fired afterwards, right? Like, everyone who worked on the Oscars got fired? Because if not, then something is really wrong with ABC. Because that show was NUTS. I felt like I was on drugs (not that I know what that feels like). That part where they brought out Kirk Douglas and he just babbled for a long time? I didn’t even realize he was presenting an award until someone brought him that envelope! And then they fought? Over his cane? I don’t get it! Was there anything to get? Was it a joke? And then how the first two Best Song performances were completely inaudible? I like that Toy Story 3 song! I would’ve liked to have heard Randy Newman sing it! (Also, did anyone else know that the guy from Chuck was in Tangled and/or could sing? I didn’t!) And how Anne Hathaway kept screwing up her lines the whole time (I did not find that charming, although I generally like her)? And how she sang that weird song about how Hugh Jackman wouldn’t perform with her this year even though she performed with him when he hosted? That was super weird! And boring! Which is WORSE.
Anyway, that’s my opinion: pretty bad. Which is exactly how my ballot ended up turning out. Behold.
Best Picture: The King’s Speech Yay! That is indeed what won!
Best Director: Darren Aronofsky for Black Swan Whoops! Tom Hooper totally won this for The King’s Speech.
Best Actor: Javier Bardem for Biutiful Whoops! No, in fact, Javier Bardem does NOT win all the Oscars–Colin Firth won this for The King’s Speech. (Side note: MR. DARCY 4 LYFE!)
Best Actress: Natalie Portman for Black Swan Ugh, yes, this happened. And she said that weird thing in her acceptance speech about how “her love” (that guy who choreographed Black Swan that is her fiance now) “gave her the best role of all” and then she touched her belly? Did anyone else find that creepy? There’s a better way to say that, Natalie.
Best Supporting Actor: Geoffrey Rush for The King’s Speech Booo! Christian Bale won this! He’s the worst!
Best Supporting Actress: Helena Bonham Carter for The King’s Speech Whoops! Melissa Leo won. I have no opinion about this except that A. her dress was weird and B. her acceptance speech was annoying. I’m sure she was great in The Fighter, though.
Best Original Screenplay: Inception: Christopher Nolan So the guy who wrote The King’s Speech won this, which I would normally be like, BOOOO, because I wanted to be right and also I thought Inception was great and it didn’t win anything except technical awards but then it turns out that this guy who wrote The King’s Speech was a stammerer and also that he had to wait for the Queen Mum to die to make this movie and by that time he was old and couldn’t get an agent to represent the screenplay and it was a heartwarming story and now I’m on board. If I had KNOWN all of that I would have PICKED him, but alas.
Best Adapted Screenplay: The Social Network: Aaron Sorkin Got this one right! NAILING IT!
Obviously I ended up losing the contest, but that’s okay. Because I got this in return. I don’t know what’s happening with WordPress right now, but I can’t seem to embed YouTube videos. However, if you click that link it will take you to the Oscars autotune, which is pretty great and special and all the good things. You’re welcome.
In closing, here are a few of my favorite dresses of the night. You’re welcome! Happy Oscars everyone!
- Filed under: random
- Tagged: Academy Awards, Anna's boring life, movies, Oscars, television
- 3 Comments »
Posted on February 25th, 2011 by annakjarzab
My friend Joe is having an Oscars party on Sunday and he sent around an online ballot for us all to fill out (I believe there are prizes involved). These were my picks:
Best Picture: The King’s Speech
Best Director: Darren Aronofsky for Black Swan
Best Actor: Javier Bardem for Biutiful
Best Actress: Natalie Portman for Black Swan
Best Supporting Actor: Geoffrey Rush for The King’s Speech
Best Supporting Actress: Helena Bonham Carter for The King’s Speech
Best Original Screenplay: Inception: Christopher Nolan
Best Adapted Screenplay: The Social Network: Aaron Sorkin
Now, I don’t really want Natalie Portman to win because, while I liked Black Swan, it was sort of silly and over-the-top and so was her acting. And also I just generally don’t like her very much. And I’m not attached to Javier Bardem winning for Best Actor, but I feel like he wins all the Oscars, so it feels like a safe bet.
As for Best Picture, I’ve actually seen most of the nominated movies, with the exception of 127 Hours (because, you know, je refuse), The Fighter and The Kids Are All Right. While I think it’s probably going to be either The King’s Speech (which I did love) or The Social Network (also really enjoyed that), I feel sorry for Christopher Nolan, because Inception was an entirely original thing that he created and it feels a bit like his magnum opus. It’s unfair to me that, like, Shakespeare in Love, in the running for the worst movie of all time and also a completely inaccurate portrayal of Shakespeare, won an Oscar and Inception might get overshadowed by newer, buzzier (which is CRAZY because Inception was hella buzzy!) movies like The Social Network.
I’m interested to see how it goes, and I’ll let you know if I win a prize!
Posted on February 24th, 2011 by annakjarzab
So I don’t know if you guys heard, but my amazing friend Alex Bracken just sold her first TRILOGY last week! Here’s the announcement from Publishers Marketplace:
February 23, 2011 Children’s:
Young Adult Alexandra Bracken’s BLACK IS THE COLOR, a near-future thriller trilogy about a sixteen-year old escapee from a “rehabilitation camp” and her quest to understand her abilities as she tries to determine who to trust and how to stay alive, to Emily Meehan at Disney-Hyperion, in a significant deal, in a three-book deal, for publication in Spring 2013, by Merrilee Heifetz.
I think I’ve mentioned BLACK IS THE COLOR on this blog before, but I have been in love with this book from the jump. The minute Alex told me about it (over margaritas, I guess, although I don’t really remember it, which might be because there were margaritas involved) I knew that I was going to absolutely adore it, and I do! I’ve read probably like, what, five drafts of it? And I can honestly tell you that it’s one of the most exciting YA novels I’ve ever read, with THE BEST ROMANCE. Seriously, you are going to swoon for her male lead. BLACK IS THE COLOR is also totally heartbreaking in places, which I just love–I often say that if a book doesn’t leave me either grinning like an idiot (i.e. Anna and the French Kiss) or feeling like I’ve been punched in the gut, the author is doing it wrong. This book does both, so it’s pretty much the best.
Yay Alex! I cannot WAIT to go to the store and buy this book for everybody I know.
Posted on February 23rd, 2011 by annakjarzab
So as regular readers may know, my comments tool is trashed for some reason and every comment that’s left here needs to be approved, but I don’t get approval notices, it just pretends that it’s spam. So I often don’t see comments until way after the fact, but anyway Shannel said on my final Watson post:
I love that Jeopardy follows up Watson with Teen Jeopardy… I’m sure this was intentional to make us all feel a little more accomplished… GLEE category for example!
Which, first off: yes. I really think that’s why they did it, or at least that’s how I feel watching Teen Jeopardy! after the smackdown that was the MAN VS. MACHINE!!! tournament–can you call it a tournament when it’s only two games? Anyway. But here’s a question for all you Jeopardy! lovers out there: why does Teen Jeopardy! look like it was shot in the late nineties?
Alex Bracken suggests that it’s because part of the test for getting on Teen Jeopardy! is having to build a time machine to take you back to the nineties in order to compete. Which is as good an explanation as any, I guess. Also: teens love lower case sans serif bubble fonts in pink and green, I guess?!
I’m actually behind on Jeopardy! so those are my only current thoughts. The Teen tournament is probably over or almost over by now, and I need to catch up. Although, no, I actually have another thought, re: the first episode of Teen Jeopardy! In the Double Jeopardy round there was a category called What Kids Are Reading These Days or something, and while it was illuminating as to what the Jeopardy! writers think kids are reading these days, it also was weird how the contestants completely avoided that category until ALL the other questions were gone and they didn’t have a choice. Why is that? First of all, the questions were softballs, and second of all, do these kids not read? They’re on Jeopardy! They MUST read, at least the girl contestant (sorry to stereotype, but women buy like 80% of books or something, so it’s really just facts). I thought that was weird.
Anyway, some other things happening in my life: Hallelujah is going to my editor, I think, so that’s good. I’m super, super nervous about it because we all know what happened the last time I turned in a book to my editor, but whatever! Can’t think about that!
Also, I started a new book. On January 31, 2011. I know this because I date all of my drafts from the first day I create the document. I currently have 200 pages. That is RIDICULOUSLY fast for me. I’ve never written so much so fast, probably ever in my life. I’m having the best time writing this book, for a few reasons. First of all, it’s not promised to anyone, nor do I need it to fill a slot in an already signed contract, so I can just write it. For myself. It’s really bad right now, too, so I wouldn’t show it to anyone. There’s this piece of advice writers give each other that goes something like “Give yourself permission to be bad.” I don’t ever say that to people nor do I like it as a piece of advice, although I don’t have a coherent answer for why that is, but in this case I’m just chugging along with the ms no matter how bad I know it is. And it is bad in places. It’s riddled with inconsistencies and logical errors, the world is underdeveloped and contradictory, and one character is foiling me entirely, but I’m continuing to write him even though I know it’s not right (I’m close, and I understand him, but it’s not finding its way to the page), and I’m going forward in the ms even though I know about the inconsistencies and the logical errors and the underdeveloped world. I’m just too excited to stop and fix anything. I want to find out what happens and put it away. Maybe I’ll never pull it out again, or maybe it’ll be my third book. I like the fact that I can just enjoy the process of discovering it without all the pressure of what it’s going to become or who’s going to like it. It’s so far outside my normal ken it’s possible I’ll never show it to anyone at all. It’s pretty cool to just enjoy writing again.
Here are a few random bits of potpourri about this current book, again just for fun:
- It sparked a long and ongoing conversation with my Ho-fficial Historian, Alex Bracken, about the Revolutionary War, George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, and geography of the United States
- I spent a lot of time last night brushing up on my chess using this Wikipedia article
- I’m writing the book using the Normal View in Microsoft Word. I don’t know why–I’m normally a strict adherent of Page View–but Page View, to me, represents restrictions and boundaries and pressure, where as Normal View, because it’s ugly and weird and everything is so bizarrely left-justified even though there’s SO! MUCH! ROOM! on the other side of the page, makes me feel like I’m just goofing off and having fun
- The Man in the Iron Mask
And that’s what’s happening over here.
Posted on February 17th, 2011 by annakjarzab
I stole that subject line from Ken Jennings because it turns out Ken Jennings is funny? Who knew? He was DYING on Jeopardy! Man Vs. Machine today. He played great, way better than he played in the last game, but it wasn’t enough to beat Watson, who actually got the Final Jeopardy question right this time (Bram Stoker), and every time Watson buzzed in before him he looked like he wanted to jump out of his skin. I’ve never seen a Jeopardy! contestant so visibly annoyed before.
Anyway, this was an interesting experiment (I loved how Alex Trebeck made sure to remind everyone that Watson was created by some really talented people at the end of the show so that we didn’t all take to Facebook going, “THE RISE OF THE MACHINES APPROACHES”, even though I did that anyway), but I’m looking forward to the upcoming teen Jeopardy! rounds. It’ll be a nice distraction from the fact that our computers are now smarter than we are, and possibly I will get more answers right, although probably not because the teens are in school and learning stuff and I’m just watching Jeopardy! all the time.
- Filed under: random
- Tagged: Anna's boring life, Jeopardy, television, the rise of the machines
- 2 Comments »
Posted on February 17th, 2011 by annakjarzab
So we have this new internal social networking tool at work that will probably become a nightmare time suck for me (I spent 15 minutes trying to figure out what my avatar should be, and then I changed it–I could get way into this because it’s smart people talking about how to do our jobs better!), and on it I found this link to an article about why Watson flubbed the Final Jeopardy question on last night’s second installment of Jeopardy! Man Vs. Machine!!!
From IBM’s Smarter Planet blog:
David Ferrucci, the manager of the Watson project at IBM Research, explained during a viewing of the show on Monday morning that several of things probably confused Watson. First, the category names on Jeopardy! are tricky. The answers often do not exactly fit the category. Watson, in his training phase, learned that categories only weakly suggest the kind of answer that is expected, and, therefore, the machine downgrades their significance. The way the language was parsed provided an advantage for the humans and a disadvantage for Watson, as well. “What US city” wasn’t in the question. If it had been, Watson would have given US cities much more weight as it searched for the answer. Adding to the confusion for Watson, there are cities named Toronto in the United States and the Toronto in Canada has an American League baseball team. It probably picked up those facts from the written material it has digested. Also, the machine didn’t find much evidence to connect either city’s airport to World War II. (Chicago was a very close second on Watson’s list of possible answers.) So this is just one of those situations that’s a snap for a reasonably knowledgeable human but a true brain teaser for the machine.
Well, first of all, the question would never be phrased “What US city” because that’s not how Jeopardy! questions are ever phrased–because they’re phrased as answers, as we all know, not questions. And it does make me wonder, not for the first time, where Watson gets his info from in the first place. I mean, they said at the beginning of the first episode that he’s not connected to the Internet–sure, obviously, that would be cheating. BUT, is he loaded up with an amount of information that an educated person of middle age (i.e. the people who are normally on Jeopardy!) would know, or way more than such a person would know? How much base data does he have access to in the first place? Because if it would take a normal human 100 years to amass the amount of information that Watson has stored in him, then that is actually cheating, or at the very least it’s a much different game. Instead of showing that Watson can think like a human, it’s showing that computers can now think in the same way humans can BUT BETTER because they don’t have to learn anything, they just have to have information uploaded.
But otherwise, basically he’s saying what I said in my last blog–that some questions are easy for humans but hard for the machine, probably because of all the information it has to parse through. Sometimes knowing less is knowing more.
- Filed under: random
- Tagged: Anna's boring life, Jeopardy, rise of the machines, television
- 0 Comments »
Posted on February 16th, 2011 by annakjarzab
So last night Brad, Ken and Watson finished their first game of Jeopardy! amidst what was basically a glorified commercial for IBM. Fine. I guess they did spend about 8 glockjillion dollars building Watson so that we could all enjoy be horrified by two lousy games of Jeopardy!, so they deserve the air time. Because yeah, Watson won. BY A LOT. Like, A LOT. I was actually wrong when I said that it was beating the humans after the Jeopardy round, because it wasn’t–it was tied with Brad Rutter. But during Double Jeopardy things got, um, real. Watson pwned the crap out of Brad and especially Ken, who was not having a great game. The thing about competing against Watson is that it has no emotions, so there’s nothing to slow down the way it processes data. It can’t psyche itself out or doubt itself, not in the same way a human can. So that’s got to be frustrating, although Brad and Ken are doing a good job at hiding it. I was not. I kept yelling at the screen. I was even having a hard time answering the questions in the face of Watson; usually I get about 65% of the answers on a normal all-human game of Jeopardy!, but in this game I get like maybe 20%. It’s demoralizing. I’m getting psyched out and I’m not even competing!
So Watson ended the game with over $20,000–possibly over $30,000, I can’t remember. But here’s the kicker: it got the Final Jeopardy question wrong. I think the question was too sophisticated for Watson. The category was US CITIES, and the answer was “Its largest airport is named after a World War II hero, and it’s second largest after a World War II battle.” Once you give it a think, the answer is pretty obvious: Chicago. O’Hare International was originally called Orchard (which is why its airport code is ORD), but was renamed for Butch O’Hare, a naval aviator who was the first flying ace and Medal of Honor recipient in World War II. And Midway is Chicago’s second largest airport, originally named Chicago Municipal Airport until 1949 when the name was changed to Midway after the World War II Battle of Midway.
The question seems pretty straightforward, especially if you grew up in or lived in Chicago like I did, but it actually involves some pretty sophisticated thinking to figure it out if you don’t already know the answer. Of course you know that it’s a US city because that’s the category, but then you have to think of all the cities that have more than one airport. If you take for granted that “city” in this case does NOT mean metro area (ruling out cities like San Francisco, where the other airports are in surrounding cities), that leaves you with:
- Los Angeles (LAX and Long Beach, which I didn’t think was within the LA city limits but apparently is, and Bob Hope–which, who knew that existed?)
- New York City (JFK and LaGuardia)
- Seattle (SeaTac and Boeing Field)
- Baltimore (Dulles and Reagan)
- Chicago (O’Hare and Midway)
- Dallas (Love Field and Dallas-Ft. Worth)
- Houston (George Bush and Hobby)
Seven choices. Immediately Houston, New York, and Baltimore are ruled out because their largest airports are named after US presidents, and not ones that fought in World War II. Dallas, Los Angeles and SeaTac are out because their biggest airports are named after the cities they are in. So you’re left with Chicago. It’s really just process of elimination, and a human would probably not even think of Houston, Seattle, or Dallas because their “second largest airports” are not really large airports at all, which cuts down on the thinking that’s necessary. Ken and Brad both got the question right, but neither wagered much money so it didn’t make a big difference in the score.
Guess what Watson answered?
(Those question marks were actually part of Watson’s answer, which, according to Trebeck, meant that Watson was “very unsure” about it. Duh.)
And if you’ve been paying attention, THAT ANSWER DOESN’T EVEN FIT THE CATEGORY because Toronto is NOT A US CITY.
Watson ultimately wagered very little money, so the scores were pretty much the same at the end of Final Jeopardy as they were at the end of Double Jeopardy. Wednesday is game 2 and the scores will be combined to determine the ultimate winner (who gets $1 million, by the way, although what is a computer going to do with $1 million? See what I meant about wanting things?). I can’t wait!
Posted on February 15th, 2011 by annakjarzab
Okay, so I figured out today that it’s technically called the Jeopardy! IBM Challenge, but whatever: Man Vs. Machine sound so much more ominous, does it not?
Anyway, tonight was the first installment of what will heretofor be known as Jeopardy! MAN VS. MACHINE!!! The idea is that IBM created a supercomputer that was built to process information the way a human brain processes information, by making sophisticated connections using natural language, all with the purpose of beating the pants off Jeopardy!‘s biggest winners: Ken Jennings, who was a 74-day Jeopardy! champion, and Brad Rutter, the all-time highest money winner on the program. Brad Rutter, by the way, got SUPER cute between his Jeopardy! run and now–I guess with all that money he hired a trainer or something, apparently he lives in LA now and is trying to be an actor/game show host, which made him slightly less attractive in our eyes, as did his non-stop talking during the contestant introduction part of the game, which is by far my least favorite part.
Brad and Ken will be playing against Watson, the computer. Now, I’m simultaneously amazed and terrified by the possibility that a computer might be able to beat human beings at a game as sophisticated as Jeopardy! I’m imagining an I, Robot future for us all, but whatevs. So the game is being played over three days, with two games spaced out between the days. Today they played only the Jeopardy round of the first game–Double Jeopardy and Final Jeopardy are tomorrow, and I’m guessing Wednesday will be game two. Right now, Watson is just killing the human contestants–SCARY RIGHT? I mean, he’s winning by a lot.
However, Watson has some difficulties. One of the biggest problems with Watson is that he can’t (obviously) see or hear, so unlike a normal Jeopardy! contestant he can’t tell when another contestant has answered a question incorrectly. A human contestant would know that, for instance, Ken gave an answer that was wrong and they can assess whether or not, in light of what they know is not the answer to the question, they should hazard their own, different guess. At least once Watson gave an answer that was already shown to be incorrect. Trebeck, of course, being Trebeck, was like, “No, Ken already said that.” WATSON CANNOT HEAR YOU ALEX!
And Jeopardy! is more than a straightforward Q&A quiz show. It uses a lot of wordplay, double meanings and jokes, not all of which the computer can accurately perceive. But interestingly the category Watson had the toughest time with was one in which the answer gave a couple different things that happened in history and the contestants had to say which decade it happened in. Watson, for whatever reason, couldn’t answer the questions. For almost the entire category it couldn’t even figure out the proper sort of answer (meaning that it wasn’t even proposing decades). Finally, it was able to come up with a decade for an answer, but that was also wrong.
It’s an interesting thing to watch. At the bottom the screen, you can see the top three answers it comes up with to every question, and each question has a bar that charts exactly how certain (in percentage) Watson is about that answer. When it reaches the “buzz threshold”–i.e. the point at which it is confident enough in an answer to buzz in–it attempts to buzz. And the computer is quick; if it wants to answer a question, it usually beats the human contestants. Watching the top three answers is pretty fascinating, too. One time, for example, in the Beatles People category, the answer was Lady Madonna–the other two answers that Watson had on his list, below Lady Madonna, were actually related to Madonna the person, NOT the Beatles at all. Things that make you go “hm.”
I’m super excited to see how this plays out. After it was over, of course we got sidetracked talking about just how likely the rise of the machines actually is, and I brought up the fact that machines don’t really want things. Until machines can not only think, but also desire, they probably won’t take over the world. Which then led me off on a tangent about the amazing Catherine Fisher novel, Incarceron, which is about an artifical intelligence that does learn to desire things, to the detriment of all that live under its thumb (because the things it desires usually aren’t in the best interest of anyone else). You should all ready that book, it’s great.
See you back here tomorrow for my thoughtsicles about round two of Jeopardy! MAN VS. MACHINE!!!
- Filed under: random
- Tagged: Anna's boring life, artificial intelligence, Books, computers, Incarceron, mathematics, rise of the machines, science, television
- 0 Comments »
Posted on February 14th, 2011 by annakjarzab
So as you know, I finished my most recent draft of The Opposite of Hallelujah a week ago and sent it to my agent. It’s at this point, when you’re a writer, that you end up sitting in your pajamas on a Saturday morning wondering, “What do I do NOW?” That’s if, like, you’re single and childless–I’m sure authors who are also parents have plenty to do with the time they usually spend writing. Anyway, I don’t have children and I’m all caught up on my TV, so I did two things this weekend: I read, and I wrote.
First I finally finished Brother/Sister, which is this CRAZY mystery told from alternating perspectives. Is it really a mystery? I’m not too sure about what to call it. It’s certainly a thriller, perhaps a psychological thriller? Anyway, it has these two narrators who are both unreliable in their own ways, the writing is really great and the suspense is really well done and subtle. And then–AND THEN–the end of the book turns everything that you think you know about what happened completely on its head! I was out singing karaoke on Saturday for my friend Monica’s birthday and I didn’t get home until 4 AM, but if you don’t think I stayed up even later to finish Brother/Sister then you don’t know me very well. I also read a really great manuscript for a book we’re publishing in Fall 2011 and it was ALSO awesome and totally scary. I’m shocked I didn’t have nightmares last night.
I also started working on a book that I’ve been thinking about writing for a while. It’s basically a sci-fi thriller and I am LOVING writing it. The best part about writing it is that I don’t have to ever show it to a single person (except maybe Alex, who might kill me if I don’t let her read it after all the talking we’ve been doing about it). It’s mine. I don’t owe to anyone, and I don’t have to worry about other people liking it. Of course at some point I probably will worry about those things, and I’m not saying that every time I see a deal on PM or PW I don’t jump out of my skin a little, but that’s only natural. In those moments I just keep reminding myself, this is your book. You’re writing it for you, not for anyone else. Enjoy it.
And I am enjoying it. I don’t think I’ve had so much fun writing a book in years; it’s a nice change of pace from what the last year or so has been like, writing-wise, for me, which is extraordinarily difficult and not nearly as rewarding as it once was. But this book is cool. Alex once said to me that she tries to write books that her brother would read, and for once I’m trying to do that, too. I’ve only got 60 pages of this book (let’s call it Book 3 for tagging purposes) and so far there has been a 2-on-3 physical fight and a car chase, and I plan for there to be escapes and imprisonments and espionage and betrayal and love and heartbreak and double-crossing and science! All in one book! One hopefully not 800 pages long book (I don’t think it will be that long, but Hallelujah is, inexplicably, like 400 manuscript pages, which is almost 100 pages longer than AUT and I do not know how that happened).
ALSO: Jeopardy! Man vs. Machine* starts tonight! I may or may not have made this clear in my last blog post, but I DVR Jeopardy! every night. Sometimes I watch them nightly, but most of the time I let them build up and watch them all in a row on the weekends. Right now I’m a little behind, but I’m going to be sure to watch tonight’s IMMEDIATELY. I love Jeopardy! I even violated my own very strict “no paying for iPhone apps” rule to download the $4.99 Jeopardy! app.
So that’s my life right now. Reading (I also plucked a copy of Diana Mosely: Mitford Beauty, British Fascist, Hitler’s Angel from my shelf; I’ve had it for a while, bought it for $5 at the Strand, because as you may or may not know I love anything having to do with the Mitfords and hope someday to read everything there is by or about them, but Diana is not my fave so I hadn’t actually ever started this biography of her), writing, and Jeopardy! You would think that would give me plenty of time to update this blog, but apparently that’s not true, although you might be interested to know that I do update my Tumblr way more often and recently I posted a bunch of songs over there that reminded me of The Opposite of Hallelujah, so you might want to head over there and have a listen.
*I don’t think that the Jeopardy! people are calling it this, that’s just what I’m calling it.
- Filed under: writing
- Tagged: book 3, Books, Jeopardy, reading, television, Tumblr, writing
- 3 Comments »
Posted on February 8th, 2011 by annakjarzab
The other day, Alex and I were joking around online about making each other the executors of our literary estates if something were to (God forbid) happen to us, and then a few days later Alex sent me this link to Neil Gaiman’s blog post about “taking care of your posthumous intellectual property.” It includes a downloadable PDF of a will that you can edit with your specifications, and as Neil says, “if you’re an author, or even a weekend author with just a few short stories published, or one thin book you don’t think anyone read or would want to republish, fill it out. Sign it and date it in front of witnesses. Put it somewhere safe.”
So that’s what I’m doing. And if you’re a writer, you will do it, too. Just a lovely PSA for your Tuesday morning.